![]() ; Khan, Wali Ullah ![]() in IEEE Systems Journal (2022) The combination of nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) using power-domain with backscatter communication (BC) is expected to connect large-scale Internet of things (IoT) devices in the future sixth ... [more ▼] The combination of nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) using power-domain with backscatter communication (BC) is expected to connect large-scale Internet of things (IoT) devices in the future sixth-generation era. This article introduces a BC in a multicell IoT network, where a source in each cell transmits a superimposed signal to its associated IoT devices using NOMA. The backscatter sensor tag (BST) also transmits data to IoT devices by reflecting and modulating the superimposed signal of the source. A new optimization framework is provided that simultaneously optimizes the total power of each source, power allocation coefficient of IoT devices, and RC of BST under imperfect successive interference cancellation decoding. This work aims to maximize the total energy efficiency (EE) of the IoT network subject to the quality of services of each IoT device. The problem is first transformed using the Dinkelbach method and then decoupled into two subproblems. The Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions and dual Lagrangian method are employed to obtain efficient solutions. In addition, we also calculate the EE of the conventional NOMA network without BC as a benchmark framework. Simulation results unveil the advantage of our considered NOMA BC network over the conventional NOMA network in terms of system total EE. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 17 (0 UL)![]() ; ; et al in Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences (2022) Emerging vehicular applications with strict latency and reliability requirements pose high computing requirements, and current vehicles’ computational resources are not adequate to meet these demands. In ... [more ▼] Emerging vehicular applications with strict latency and reliability requirements pose high computing requirements, and current vehicles’ computational resources are not adequate to meet these demands. In this scenario, vehicles can get help to process tasks from other resource-rich computing platforms, including nearby vehicles, fixed edge servers, and remote cloud servers. Nonetheless, different vehicular communication network (VCN) modes need to be utilized to access these computing resources, improving applications and networks’ performance and quality of service (QoS). In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on the vehicular task offloading techniques under a communication perspective, i.e., vehicle to vehicle (V2V), vehicle to roadside infrastructure (V2I), and vehicle to everything (V2X). For the task/computation offloading, we present the classification of methods under the V2V, V2I, and V2X communication domains. Besides, the task/computation offloading categories are each sub-categorized according to their schemes’ objectives. Furthermore, the literature on vehicular task offloading is elaborated, compared, and analyzed from the perspectives of approaches, objectives, merits, demerits, etc. Finally, we highlight the open research challenges in this field and predict future research trends. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 18 (0 UL)![]() ; ; et al in IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2022) The last two decades have seen a clear trend toward crafting intelligent vehicles based on the significant advances in communication and computing paradigms, which provide a safer, stress-free, and more ... [more ▼] The last two decades have seen a clear trend toward crafting intelligent vehicles based on the significant advances in communication and computing paradigms, which provide a safer, stress-free, and more enjoyable driving experience. Moreover, emerging applications and services necessitate massive volumes of data, real-time data processing, and ultrareliable and low-latency communication (URLLC). However, the computing capability of current intelligent vehicles is minimal, making it challenging to meet the delay-sensitive and computation-intensive demand of such applications. In this situation, vehicular task/computation offloading toward the edge cloud (EC) and vehicular cloudlet (VC) seems to be a promising solution to improve the network’s performance and applications’ Quality of Service (QoS). At the same time, artificial intelligence (AI) has dramatically changed people’s lives. Especially for vehicular task offloading applications, AI achieves state-of-the-art performance in various vehicular environments. Motivated by the outstanding performance of integrating reinforcement learning (RL)/deep RL (DRL) to the vehicular task offloading systems, we present a survey on various RL/DRL techniques applied to vehicular task offloading. Precisely, we classify the vehicular task offloading works into two main categories: 1) RL/ DRL solutions leveraging EC and 2) RL/DRL solutions using VC computing. Moreover, the EC section-based RL/DRL solutions are further subcategorized into multiaccess edge computing (MEC) server, nearby vehicles, and hybrid MEC (HMEC). To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to cover RL/DRL-based vehicular task offloading. Also, we provide lessons learned and open research challenges in this field and discuss the possible trend for future research. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 13 (0 UL) |
||