References of "Fernández San Martín, M. I."
     in
Bookmark and Share    
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOne consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology
Nabbe, P.; Le Reste, J. Y.; Guillou-Landreat, M. et al

in BMC Research Notes (2018), 11(1), 4

From a systematic literature review (SLR), it became clear that a consensually validated tool was needed by European General Practitioner (GP) researchers in order to allow multi-centred collaborative ... [more ▼]

From a systematic literature review (SLR), it became clear that a consensually validated tool was needed by European General Practitioner (GP) researchers in order to allow multi-centred collaborative research, in daily practice, throughout Europe. Which diagnostic tool for depression, validated against psychiatric examination according to the DSM, would GPs select as the best for use in clinical research, taking into account the combination of effectiveness, reliability and ergonomics? A RAND/UCLA, which combines the qualities of the Delphi process and of the nominal group, was used. GP researchers from different European countries were selected. The SLR extracted tools were validated against the DSM. The Youden index was used as an effectiveness criterion and Cronbach's alpha as a reliability criterion. Ergonomics data were extracted from the literature. Ergonomics were tested face-to-face. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 166 (1 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailWhich DSM validated tools for diagnosing depression are usable in primary care research? A systematic literature review
Nabbe, P.; Le Reste, J. Y.; Guillou-Landreat, M. et al

in European Psychiatry (2016), 39

IntroductionDepression occurs frequently in primary care. Its broad clinical variability makes it difficult to diagnose. This makes it essential that family practitioner (FP) researchers have validated ... [more ▼]

IntroductionDepression occurs frequently in primary care. Its broad clinical variability makes it difficult to diagnose. This makes it essential that family practitioner (FP) researchers have validated tools to minimize bias in studies of everyday practice. Which tools validated against psychiatric examination, according to the major depression criteria of DSM-IV or 5, can be used for research purposes? [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 155 (0 UL)