![]() ; ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() Book published by Collge Publications (2019) We describe the state of the Talmudic Logic project as of end of 2019. The Talmud is the most comprehensive and fundamental work of Jewish religious law, employing a large number of logical components ... [more ▼] We describe the state of the Talmudic Logic project as of end of 2019. The Talmud is the most comprehensive and fundamental work of Jewish religious law, employing a large number of logical components centuries ahead of their time. In many cases the basic principles are not explicitly formulated, which makes it difficult to formalize and make available to the modern student of Logic. This project on Talmudic Logic, aims to present logical analysis of Talmudic reasoning using modern logical tools. We investigate principles of Talmudic Logic and publish a series of books, one book or more for each principle. http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/stl/ The series begins with the systematic analysis of Talmudic inference rules. The first book shows that we can present Talmudic reasoning intuitions as a systematic logical system basic to modern non-deductive reasoning, such as Argumentum A Fortiori, Abduction and Analogy. The second book offers a systematic common sense method for intuitively defining sets and claims that this method adequately models the Talmudic use of the rules Klal uPrat. These books also criticize modern Talmudic research methodology. Later books deal with additional topics like Deontic logic, and Temporal logic, Agency and processes in the Talmud and more. The aims of the project are two fold: 1. To import into the Talmudic study modern logical methods with a view to help understand complicated Talmudic passages, which otherwise cannot be addressed. 2. To export from the Talmud new logical principles which are innovative and useful to modern contemporary logic. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 73 (1 UL)![]() ; ; et al in Journal of Logics (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 64 (0 UL)![]() ; ; et al in Computational Models of Rationality, Essays dedicated to Gabriele Kern-Isberner on the occasion of her 60th birthday (2016) Detailed reference viewed: 48 (0 UL)![]() ![]() ; ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Abraham, Michael; Gabbay, Dov M.; Schild, Uri (Eds.) Platonic Realism and Talmudic Reasoning (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 50 (0 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in HOWARD-60: A Festschrift on the Occasion of Howard Barringer's 60th Birthday (2014) Detailed reference viewed: 58 (0 UL)![]() ; ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Journal of Applied Logic (2013), 11(1), 63--90 Detailed reference viewed: 128 (2 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Artificial Intelligence and Law (2012), 20(2), 145--179 Detailed reference viewed: 124 (1 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Artificial Intelligence and Law (2011), 19(2-3), 117148 Detailed reference viewed: 141 (1 UL)![]() Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() Book published by College Publications (2010) Detailed reference viewed: 56 (0 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in DEON (2010) This paper examines the deontic logic of the Talmud. We shall find, by looking at examples, that at first approximation we need deontic logic with several connectives: OTA Talmudic obligation FTA Talmudic ... [more ▼] This paper examines the deontic logic of the Talmud. We shall find, by looking at examples, that at first approximation we need deontic logic with several connectives: OTA Talmudic obligation FTA Talmudic prohibition FDA Standard deontic prohibition ODA Standard deontic obligation [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 130 (0 UL)![]() ; Gabbay, Dov M. ![]() in Studia Logica (2009), 92(3), 281364 We motivate and introduce a new method of abduction, Matrix Abduction, and apply it to modelling the use of non-deductive inferences in the Talmud such as Ana- logy and the rule of Argumentum A Fortiori ... [more ▼] We motivate and introduce a new method of abduction, Matrix Abduction, and apply it to modelling the use of non-deductive inferences in the Talmud such as Ana- logy and the rule of Argumentum A Fortiori. Given a matrix A with entries in {0,1},we allow for one or more blank squares in the matrix, say ai,j=?. The method allows us to decide whether to declare ai,j=0 or ai,j=1 or ai,j=? undecided. This algorithmic method is then applied to modelling several legal and practical reasoning situations including the Talmudic rule of Kal-Vachomer. We add an Appendix showing that this new rule of Matrix Abduction, arising from the Talmud, can also be applied to the analysis of paradoxes in voting and judgement aggregation. In fact we have here a general method for executing non-deductive inferences. [less ▲] Detailed reference viewed: 116 (0 UL) |
||