Reference : Expertise und diagnostische Urteilsbildung : ein sozial-kognitiver Ansatz
Dissertations and theses : Doctoral thesis
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Multidisciplinary, general & others
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/8150
Expertise und diagnostische Urteilsbildung : ein sozial-kognitiver Ansatz
German
[en] Expertise and diagnostic judgment formation: A social-cognitive approach.
Böhmer, Matthias mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Languages, Culture, Media and Identities (LCMI) >]
7-Feb-2011
University of Luxembourg, ​Luxembourg, ​​Luxembourg
Universität des Saarlandes, ​​Deutschland
Docteur en Psychologie
115
Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine mailto
Vögele, Claus mailto
Schiltz, Christine mailto
Kaufmann, Martina
Hoellen, Burkhard
[en] expertise ; diagnostic judgment formation ; social judgment formation ; social cognition ; processing goals
[en] In this thesis experts’ diagnostic judgment formation is seen as a social cognitive process: It is analyzed as a person-related judgment and is investigated according to the social cognition paradigm. The theoretical foundation is provided by dual process models (e.g. continuum model), which assume two different strategies of person-related information processing in order to form a judgment. The heuristic strategy is characterized by a categorization process and the corresponding activation of a specific person category. The information integrating strategy focuses on individual characterization of a person and the corresponding collection and integration of individual person attributes. A judge’s expertise is acknowledged to have an essential influence on the process of judgment formation. Experts, in contrast to laymen, are able to switch between the two strategies. The degree to which diagnostic judgment formation can be described by means of dual process models is investigated in a series of four quasi-experiments including psychotherapists and teachers as experts and students and staff members of Saarland University as laymen. Thus, social judgment formation is compared in two different domains. Two experiments focus on judgment itself by measuring judgmental data. The two other experiments focus on attention allocation and person memory by measuring self-paced reading time and free recall. Results show the expected pattern in both professional domains. Both psychotherapists and teachers are able to switch between the two strategies. So experts’ diagnostic judgment formation can be described by means of dual process models.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/8150
also: http://hdl.handle.net/10993/15603

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Böhmer-Thesis.pdfAuthor postprint481.62 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.