Reference : Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Neurosciences & behavior
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/7435
Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus
English
Pit-Ten Cate, Ineke mailto [Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.]
Kennedy, Collin [Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.]
Stevenson, Jim [Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.]
2002
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. Supplement
Mackeith Press
44
5
317-322
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
0419-0238
London
United Kingdom
[en] This study examined the impact of severity and type of condition and family resources on quality of life in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. A national UK sample of children aged between 6 and 13 years with spina bifida (n=62), hydrocephalus (n=354), and spina bifida plus hydrocephalus (n=128) were identified via the register of the Association for Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus (ASBAH). Parents completed standardized measures of Child Health Related Quality Of Life (CQOL), family needs survey (FNS), and caregiving self-efficacy scale (CSES) as well as questions on children's health and physical ability. Results showed there were no significant differences in the overall quality of life for the three disability conditions. The overall CQOL was over 1 SD lower for those with spina bifida and hydrocephalus than for children with other physical conditions. Sex and age were not related to overall CQOL. Specific aspects of CQOL differentiated the three groups. Children with spina. bifida had poorer CQOL scores on self-care, continence, and mobility/activities whilst those with hydrocephalus had poorer scores on school activities, worries, sight, and communication. Severity of condition and family resources, i.e. CSES and FNS, predicted 32% of the variance in CQOL. Associations were also found between overall CQOL and problems discernible at birth as well as epilepsy. Other factors, including those related to shunts, were not significantly related to CQOL. It was concluded that hydrocephalus is just as great a threat to CQOL as spina bifida. Beyond the general effect of condition severity on CQOL, family resources (as measured by the CSES and FNS) represent an additional influence on CQOL.
Researchers ; Professionals
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/7435
10.1017/S0012162201002146

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
disability and QOL.pdfPublisher postprint73.09 kBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.