Reference : Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point poistioning: method comparison
Scientific journals : Article
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences : Earth sciences & physical geography
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/4003
Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point poistioning: method comparison
English
Geng, J. mailto [University of Nottingham > Nottingham Geospatial Institute]
Meng, Xiaolin mailto [> >]
Dodson, Alan H mailto [> >]
Teferle, Felix Norman mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
2010
Journal of Geodesy
Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
84
9
569-581
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
0949-7714
[en] Precise Point Positioning ; GNSS ; GPS ; Ambiguity Resolution
[en] Integer ambiguity resolution at a single receiver can be implemented by applying improved satellite products where the fractional-cycle biases (FCBs) have been separated from the integer ambiguities in a network solution. One method to achieve these products is to estimate the FCBs by averaging the fractional parts of the float ambiguity estimates, and the other is to estimate the integer-recovery clocks by fixing the undifferenced ambiguities to integers in advance. In this paper, we theoretically prove the equivalence of the ambiguity-fixed position estimates derived from these two methods by assuming that the FCBs are hardware-dependent and only they are assimilated into the clocks and ambiguities. To verify this equivalence, we implement both methods in the Position and Navigation Data Analyst software to process 1 year of GPS data from a global network of about 350 stations. The mean biases between all daily position estimates derived from these two methods are only 0.2, 0.1 and 0.0 mm, whereas the standard deviations of all position differences are only 1.3, 0.8 and 2.0 mm for the East, North and Up components, respectively. Moreover, the differences of the position repeatabilities are below 0.2 mm on average for all three components. The RMS of the position estimates minus those from the International GNSS Service weekly solutions for the former method differs by below 0.1 mm on average for each component from that for the latter method. Therefore, considering the recognized millimeter-level precision of current GPS-derived daily positions, these statistics empirically demonstrate the theoretical equivalence of the ambiguity-fixed position estimates derived from these two methods. In practice, we note that the former method is compatible with current official clock-generation methods, whereas the latter method is not, but can potentially lead to slightly better positioning quality.
Researchers ; Professionals
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/4003
10.1007/s00190-010-0399-x
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0399-x
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com. Here only an author preprint is available.

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
orbiluversion.pdfArticle during review.Author preprint3.81 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.