Reference : Situative Interdisciplinarity: Empirical Reflections on Ten Years of Cross-Disciplina...
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Sociology & social sciences
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Multidisciplinary, general & others
Arts & humanities : Multidisciplinary, general & others
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/37679
Situative Interdisciplinarity: Empirical Reflections on Ten Years of Cross-Disciplinary Research
English
Reckinger, Rachel mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE) >]
Wille, Christian mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE) >]
Nov-2018
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
7
3
9-34
Yes
International
2281-3993
2281-4612
[en] interdisciplinarity ; Cross-Disciplinarity ; multidisciplinarity ; Transdisciplinarity ; Methodological
[en] Given the current call for interdisciplinarity, we reflect on pragmatic methodological implementations of collaborative research – by drawing on empirical evidence from two large-scale cross-disciplinary research projects and by theoretically framing them in trilingual contexts (German, French, and English). These are two major innovations compared to the existing body of literature in this domain. Our empirical analysis shows that multi-, inter- or trans-disciplinary collaboration is an oscillating process along a spectrum of cross-disciplinarity – spanning additive, converging and synthesizing work patterns, i.e. multi-, inter-, and transdisciplinarity. Such an umbrella-term avoids the common amalgamation of ‘interdisciplinarity’ as the overarching category (cross-disciplinarity of whatever form) and one of the relevant subcategories (the specific work form that a research team chooses). Concretely, if the majority of methods are developed through communal negotiation processes, then a truly interdisciplinary analysis of research results can only be guaranteed through recursive self-reflexive loops. Initial research questions may still be additive and interactions can oscillate during the project process between addition und tentative convergence. We label this process situative interdisciplinarity. Multi-, inter- and transdisciplinarity are thus subsumed as a processual entity: flexible, possibly hybrid subforms of cross-disciplinarity. It needs constant reactivation, framing, timing and mediation by project managers. The major challenge lies in the collaborative transfer of concepts, theories, methods and research subjects. This transfer requires translation, explication and transposition of the various disciplinary ‘languages’ and can only be converged in an open-minded, team-oriented and reflexive work environment.
RU IPSE
University of Luxembourg - UL
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public ; Others
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/37679
10.2478/ajis-2018-0055
http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/10347

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Reckinger-Wille-2018_Situative Interdisciplinarity_AJIS7-3.pdfSituative Interdisciplinarity: Empirical Reflections on Ten Years of Cross-Disciplinary ResearchPublisher postprint726.01 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.