Reference : Comparison of design for composite columns in steel and concrete according to Eurocod...
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
Engineering, computing & technology : Civil engineering
Physics and Materials Science
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/37345
Comparison of design for composite columns in steel and concrete according to Eurocode 4 and Chinese design codes
English
Zhang, Qingjie mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
Schäfer, Markus mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
27-Jun-2018
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures (ASCCS 2018)
Romero, Manuel
Universitat Politècnica de València
2018
8
Yes
Yes
International
9788490486016
Valencia
Spain
12th International Conference on Advances in Steel-Concrete Composite Structures (ASCCS 2018)
from 27-06-2018 to 29-06-2018
Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
València
Spain
[en] Composite Structures ; European Design Code ; Chinese Design Code
[en] This paper compares the design of composite columns in steel and concrete based on EN1994-1-1 and Chinese JGJ138-2016. First, the application ranges of the codes are pointed out. Both codes contain the design of fully encased composite sections and concrete filled rectangular and circular tubes. However, there are different limitations on cross-section sizes, material strength classes, and others. JGJ138 has three separate chapters for the designs related to the three different types of columns. Eurocode 4 gives three different design methods: one general method based on nonlinear calculation, and two simplified methods based on European buckling curves or N-M iteration curves. For the materials, mechanical properties, such as design strength values, are compared based on the same material grade. For axial compression resistance and eccentrically compressive resistance, the two simplified methods from Eurocode 4 are compared with the design method according to JGJ138-2016 through theoretical and parameter studies. The influences of related parameters such as long-term effects, the buckling curves, and N-M iteration curves are also compared. For shear design, JGJ138-2016 considers mainly transverse shear resistances, while Eurocode 4 further considers shear connection and load introduction. The design transverse shear resistance is compared through theory.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/37345

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
Q.Zhang, M. Schaefer, ASCCS2018_modify1.pdfAuthor postprint1.64 MBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.