Reference : Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-r...
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Multidisciplinary, general & others
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/29683
Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites.
English
Khazaal, Yasser [> >]
Chatton, Anne [> >]
Cochand, Sophie [> >]
Coquard, Olivier [> >]
Fernandez, Sebastien [> >]
Khan, Riaz [> >]
Billieux, Joël mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE)]
Zullino, Daniele [> >]
2009
Patient education and counseling
77
1
33-7
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
0738-3991
1873-5134
Ireland
[en] Access to Information ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Health Education ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Internet ; Linear Models ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Health ; Psychometrics ; ROC Curve ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistics as Topic ; Surveys and Questionnaires
[en] OBJECTIVE: To extract and to validate a brief version of the DISCERN which could identify mental health-related websites with good content quality. METHOD: The present study is based on the analysis of data issued from six previous studies which used DISCERN and a standardized tool for the evaluation of content quality (evidence-based health information) of 388 mental health-related websites. After extracting the Brief DISCERN, several psychometric properties (content validity through a Factor analysis, internal consistency by the Cronbach's alpha index, predictive validity through the diagnostic tests, concurrent validity by the strength of association between the Brief DISCERN and the original DISCERN scores) were investigated to ascertain its general applicability. RESULTS: A Brief DISCERN composed of two factors and six items was extracted from the original 16 items version of the DISCERN. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were more than acceptable for the complete questionnaire (alpha=0.74) and for the two distinct domains: treatments information (alpha=0.87) and reliability (alpha=0.83). Sensibility and specificity of the Brief DISCERN cut-off score > or =16 in the detection of good content quality websites were 0.357 and 0.945, respectively. Its predictive positive and negative values were 0.98 and 0.83, respectively. A statistically significant linear correlation was found between the total scores of the Brief DISCERN and those of the original DISCERN (r=0.84 and p<0.0005). CONCLUSION: The Brief DISCERN seems to be a reliable and valid instrument able to discriminate between websites with good and poor content quality. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The Brief DISCERN is a simple tool which could facilitate the identification of good information on the web by patients and general consumers.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/29683
10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.016
2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
Khazaal_PEC_2009.pdfPublisher postprint139.77 kBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.