Reference : Comparisons of Heat Map and IFL Technique to Evaluate the Performance of Commercially...
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
Computational Sciences
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/29528
Comparisons of Heat Map and IFL Technique to Evaluate the Performance of Commercially Available Cloud Providers
English
Wagle, Shyam Sharan mailto [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > >]
Guzek, Mateusz mailto [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > >]
Bouvry, Pascal mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
Bisdorff, Raymond mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
In press
Comparisons of Heat Map and IFL Technique to Evaluate the Performance of Commercially Available Cloud Providers
Yes
Yes
International
Cloud2016
27-06-2016 to 02-07-2016
IEEE
Sanfrancisco
USA
[en] Cloud Computing ; Decision Recommendation ; Cloud Brokering ; Evaluation ; Performance Heat Map ; IFL
[en] Cloud service providers (CSPs) offer different Ser- vice Level Agreements (SLAs) to the cloud users. Cloud Service Brokers (CSBs) provide multiple sets of alternatives to the cloud users according to users requirements. Generally, a CSB considers the service commitments of CSPs rather than the actual quality of CSPs services. To overcome this issue, the broker should verify the service performances while recommending cloud services to the cloud users, using all available data. In this paper, we compare our two approaches to do so: a min-max-min decomposition based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic (IFL) and a Performance Heat Map technique, to evaluate the performance of commercially available cloud providers. While the IFL technique provides simple, total order of the evaluated CSPs, Performance Heat Map provides transparent and explanatory, yet consistent evaluation of service performance of commercially available CSPs. The identified drawbacks of the IFL technique are: 1) It does not return the accurate performance evaluation over multiple decision alternatives due to highly influenced by critical feedback of the evaluators; 2) Overall ranking of the CSPs is not as expected according to the performance measurement. As a result, we recommend to use performance Heat Map for this problem.
INTER/CNRS/11/03) project
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/29528

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
CLOUD2016_Camera_Ready_Final.pdfAuthor preprint800.54 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.