Reference : Η αναχαίτιση στην ανοιχτή θάλασσα και η διαχείριση των μεταναστευτικών ροών στη Μεσόγ...
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
Law, criminology & political science : European & international law
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21268
Η αναχαίτιση στην ανοιχτή θάλασσα και η διαχείριση των μεταναστευτικών ροών στη Μεσόγειο υπό το πρίσμα της πρόσφατης νομολογίας του Ευρωπαϊκού Δικαστηρίου Δικαιωμάτων του Ανθρώπου: σκέψεις με αφορμή την υπόθεση Hirsi Jamaa και άλλοι κατά Ιταλίας
-
[en] Interception at sea and the management of migratory flows in the Mediterranean, in the light of the recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights: Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy
Pichou, Maria mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Law Research Unit >]
2015
Symposium of the Hellenic Society of International Law and International Relations ‘Applications of International Law and International Politics 20 years after the entry into force of the Convention on the Law of the Sea
Perrakis, Stelios mailto
No
Yes
Symposium of the Hellenic Society of International Law and International Relations ‘Applications of International Law and International Politics 20 years after the entry into force of the Convention on the Law of the Sea
from 10-09-2014 to 13-09-2014
Hellenic Society of International Law and International Relations Conference
Rhodes
Greece
[en] European Court of Human Rights ; Refugees ; rescue at sea
[en] Interception at sea and the management of migratory flows in Europe in light of the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy. Three major legal questions arise in light of this case: a) The relationship between Human Rights Law, the Law of the sea and the EU law, regarding people who are intercepted at sea and are in need of international protection. b) Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention of Human Rights for acts that take place on the high seas and whether this was such a case. c) The case of collective expulsion: the removal of aliens to a third state carried out outside national territory of a member state. Why is this decision important? Because the ECHR accepted that the principle of non –refoulement is applicable on the high seas. Furthermore, by accepting a violation of article 13 (effective remedy) the court enforced states obligations vis a vis this principle with two procedural consequences: the duty of the state to advise the individual in question about his entitlement to obtain international protection and the duty to provide for an individual, fair and effective refugee status determination and assessment procedure.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21268

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Maria Pichou (Rhodes Conference) August 2015.pdfAuthor preprint402.12 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.