Reference : Optimal station localization for bicycle sharing system
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Unpublished conference
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Human geography & demography
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/17867
Optimal station localization for bicycle sharing system
English
Medard de Chardon, Cyrille mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE) >]
7-Sep-2013
1 - Handy, Susan. 1992. “Regional versus Local Accessibility: Neo-traditional development and its Implications on Non-Work Travel.” Built Environment 18 (4): 253–67.
2 - Cervero, Robert, and Carolyn Radisch. 1996. “Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods.” Transport Policy 3 (3): 127–41.
3 - Cervero, R., and K-L Wu. 1997. “Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area.” Environ. Plann. A 29 (5): 865–86.
4 - Harms, Sylvia. 2003. “From Routine Choice to Rational Decision Making between Mobility Alternatives.” Paper for rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, 19-21 March.
5 - Cox, Peter. 2010. “Moving People: Sustainable Transport Development.” New York: Zed Books.
6 - Horton, Dave. 2006. “Environmentalism and the Bicycle.” Environmental Politics 15 (1): 41–58.
7 - DeMaio, Paul. 2009. “Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future.” Journal of Public Transportation 12 (4): 41–56.
8 - City of Vancouver. 2012. “Request for Expressions of Interest No. PS11187: Applications for a Public Bicycle System”. Accessed March 11, 2013. http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/requests-for-expressions-of-interest-public-bike-system.pdf.
Yes
No
International
European Colloquium of Theoretical & Quantitative Geography 2013
from 05-09-2013 to 09-09-2013
Dourdan
France
[en] Bicycle sharing systems ; cycle hire ; optimal location
[en] Many urban planning strategies for sustainable cities (New Urbanism, Mixed Use Development and Compact City) tout the need for smaller more compact communities [1, 2, 3]. These urban forms depend on a modal shift from automobiles to walking and cycling. As this shift is unlikely to be driven by the markets, increases in sustainable modal transport, infrastructure and disincentives for driving [4] are necessary [5].
In some cities, bicycle sharing systems (BSS) have been catalysts for increasing cycling through their ability to extend existing public transit systems, encourage cycling accessibility and visibility. Cycling has many direct and indirect health benefits such as cardiovascular and reduced CO emissions, compared to car transport, respectively as well as social and equity benefits [6, 5:123]. BSSs are composed of bicycles and spatially fixed stations containing a constant number of docks. Two important advantages of the current generation BSSs are simplicity and security [7]; bicycle theft is difficult yet subscribers may checkout bicycles quickly and without difficulty, allowing users to seamlessly transfer between transport modes.
The central question of this research is determining whether a mismatch occurs between BSS’s stations’ optimal locations based on origin and destination demands of potential cyclists and the existing stations. Most BSSs are being managed by private corporations, which often use advertising to subsidize the systems. BSS stations, or kiosks, often have double purposes of providing BSS services, such as checking out a bike, and displaying advertising. Effectively locating BSS stations throughout an urban fabric is of crucial importance to the adoption of the BSS. The optimal locations for advertising billboards and BSS stations are unlikely to consistently correspond. This conflict of interest has been explicitly anticipated by at least one city developing a BSS [8]. The overlap between optimal advertiser locations and stations for BSSs are destinations of high traffic such as commercial and transportation hubs. Conversely, BSS stations may insufficiently serve residential areas far from or without through-roads due to having decreased traffic and therefore marketing potential.
This project addresses the question in three steps. The first is the gathering of spatial and spatio-temporal data related to cycling demand in order to develop demand surfaces. Next, demand is contrasted against existing BSS station infrastructure. Assessment is complex due to the alternate realities between data, theory and the practical operations of placing stations within available space constraints and the varying BSS priorities, such as social or racial equity, of cities. Finally we develop a model that optimally locates BSS stations for public use across the urban fabric based on demand and network distances between stations. Performing this process across multiple cities with BSSs we bring insight into whether a localization bias exists towards high throughput and advertising valued locations.
Bicycle sharing systems may become the first new ubiquitous ‘public’ transport system in over a century. However, the initial privatization of this new transport system, whose impacts and evolution are not yet completely understood, may result in inefficiencies with lasting negative outcomes. The inadequate development of a city’s BSS may cause it to fail and stigmatize a progressive sustainable transport alternative for a generation.
Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR
Researchers
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/17867

There is no file associated with this reference.

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.