Browsing
     by title


0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

or enter first few letters:   
OK
See detailUrkunden- und Quellenbuch zur Geschichte der altluxemburgischen Territorien. Band XI : Die Urkunden Graf Johanns des Blinden (1310-1346) Teil 2: Die Urkunden aus den Archives Générales du Royaume, Brüssel
Pauly, Michel UL; Pettiau, Hérold UL; Schroeder, Jean et al

Book published by CLUDEM (2009)

Edition de 203 actes émis par Jean, comte de Luxembourg et roi de Bohème ou le concernant, entre 1310 et 1346, conservés aux Archives Générales du Royaume à Bruxelles, dans deux fonds: Chartes du ... [more ▼]

Edition de 203 actes émis par Jean, comte de Luxembourg et roi de Bohème ou le concernant, entre 1310 et 1346, conservés aux Archives Générales du Royaume à Bruxelles, dans deux fonds: Chartes du Luxembourg et Chartes du Brabant, Limbourg et pays d'Outre Meuse. Les actes sont rédigés en français, allemand et latin. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 42 (2 UL)
See detailUrsachen und Formen von Bildungsungleichheiten
Hadjar, Andreas UL

in Hofmann, Michèle; Boser, Lukas; Bütikofer, Anna (Eds.) et al Lehrbuch Pädagogik. Eine Einführung in grundlegende Themenfelder (2015)

Detailed reference viewed: 131 (16 UL)
See detailUrsachen, Prävention und Kontrolle von Gewalt aus soziologischer Sicht Gutachten der Unterkommission III (Soziologie)
Willems, Helmut UL; Eckert, Roland; Kaase, Max et al

in Schwind, Hans-Dieter; Baumann, Jürgen; u.a. (Eds.) Ursachen, Prävention und Kontrolle von Gewalt Analysen und Vorschläge der Unabhängigen Regierungskommission zur Verhinderung und Bekämpfung von Gewalt (Gewaltkommission), II (1990)

Detailed reference viewed: 124 (0 UL)
See detailDas Urteil des BVerfG zum ZDF-Staatsvertrag, Dokumentation der EMR-Veranstaltung vom 16. April 2014 in Berlin
Cole, Mark UL; Ory, Stephan; Matzneller, Peter

Book published by Nomos (2014)

Detailed reference viewed: 38 (4 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailUrteilsfehler in der schulischen Leistungsbeurteilung: Der Einfluss von Verarbeitungszielen und Expertise
Gräsel, Cornelia; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL; Dünnebier, Katrin et al

Scientific Conference (2009, March)

Detailed reference viewed: 15 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUrteilsverzerrungen in der schulischen Leistungsbeurteilung: Eine experimentelle Studie zu Ankereffekten
Dünnebier, Katrin; Gräsel, Cornelia; Krolak-Schwerdt, Sabine UL

in Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie (2009), 23

The aim of the study is to investigate anchoring effects in teachers’ assessment. Anchoring effects occur when a preceding judgement influences a subsequent judgement of the same target or task. Our ... [more ▼]

The aim of the study is to investigate anchoring effects in teachers’ assessment. Anchoring effects occur when a preceding judgement influences a subsequent judgement of the same target or task. Our experiment investigates whether teachers use the anchoring heuristic in student assessments and if its occurrence is moderated by the processing goal and teachers’ expertise. We assume that people use processing strategies according to their actual processing goals. Whereas experts are able to choose an adequate information processing depending on the situation, novices are assumed to be more susceptible to use heuristics, e.g. the anchoring heuristic, independent of their actual processing goal. In our experiment expert teachers and teacher students were asked to assess written tests of a student. They received case material including a neutral description and two tests (German and Math). Participants were either instructed to form a first impression of the student (impression formation goal) or to give an educational recommendation (prognosis goal). After reading the case material, the participants received the anchor: They were told that an experienced teacher had already assessed the tests and marked them with a grade of 2 (high anchor) or 4 (low anchor). Afterwards they had to assess the tests by themselves. Results revealed an interaction effect of expertise, anchor and processing goal. Expert teachers who assessed the student’s performance in the German test with the goal of giving an educational recommendation did not use the anchoring heuristic. Furthermore, results showed only a main effect of the anchor when assessing the math test. The assessments of the math test were assimilated to the given anchor independent of the actual processing goal or the teachers’expertise. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 94 (6 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe US SOPA and PIPA - A European Perspective
Schmitz, Sandra UL

in International Review of Law, Computers & Technology (2013), 27(1-2), 213-229

Detailed reference viewed: 111 (11 UL)
See detailDie USA als neusachliches Schreckgespenst. Adolf Halfelds "Amerika und der Amerikanismus"
Heimböckel, Dieter UL

in Vogt, Jochen; Stephan, Alexander (Eds.) Das Amerika der Autoren. Von Kafka bis 09/11 (2005)

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (0 UL)
See detailUSA im Zeichen der Wende? Klima, Umwelt, Raum, Verkehr.
Hesse, Markus UL

in Kommune - Forum für Politik, Ökonomie und Kultur (1993), 11(3), 41-45

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (1 UL)
Full Text
See detailUsability meets assessment: Equal chances in education
Weinerth, Katja UL; Koenig, Vincent UL

in World Usability Day 2011 (2011)

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (5 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailUsability-lab and Intranet websites evaluation: methodological and organisational issues
Koenig, Vincent UL; van de Leemput, Cécile

Poster (2006, July)

Detailed reference viewed: 23 (3 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUsage and testability of AOP: An empirical study of AspectJ
Munoz, F.; Baudry, B.; Delamare, R. et al

in Information and Software Technology (2013), 55(2), 252-266

Context: Back in 2001, the MIT announced aspect-oriented programming as a key technology in the next 10 years. Nowadays, 10 years later, AOP is still not widely adopted. Objective: The objective of this ... [more ▼]

Context: Back in 2001, the MIT announced aspect-oriented programming as a key technology in the next 10 years. Nowadays, 10 years later, AOP is still not widely adopted. Objective: The objective of this work is to understand the current status of AOP practice through the analysis of open-source project which use AspectJ. Method: First we analyze different dimensions of AOP usage in 38 AspectJ projects. We investigate the degree of coupling between aspects and base programs, and the usage of the pointcut description language. A second part of our study focuses on testability as an indicator of maintainability. We also compare testability metrics on Java and AspectJ implementations of the HealthWatcher aspect-oriented benchmark. Results: The first part of the analysis reveals that the number of aspects does not increase with the size of the base program, that most aspects are woven in every places in the base program and that only a small portion of the pointcut language is used. The second part about testability reveals that AspectJ reduces the size of modules, increases their cohesion but also increases global coupling, thus introducing a negative impact on testability. Conclusion: These observations and measures reveal a major trend: AOP is currently used in a very cautious way. This cautious usage could come from a partial failure of AspectJ to deliver all promises of AOP, in particular an increased software maintainability. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 20 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailUsage of Smartphone Data to Derive an Indicator for Collaborative Mobility between Individuals
Toader, Bogdan UL; Sprumont, François UL; Faye, Sébastien UL et al

in ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (2017), 6(3), 62

The potential of geospatial big data has been drawing attention for a few years. Despite the larger and larger market penetration of portable technologies (nomadic and wearable devices like smartphones ... [more ▼]

The potential of geospatial big data has been drawing attention for a few years. Despite the larger and larger market penetration of portable technologies (nomadic and wearable devices like smartphones and smartwatches), their opportunities for travel behavior analysis are still relatively unexplored. The main objective of our study is to extract the human mobility patterns from GPS traces in order to derive an indicator for enhancing Collaborative Mobility (CM) between individuals. The first step, extracting activity duration and location, is done using state-of-the-art automated recognition tools. Sensors data are used to reconstruct individual’s activity location and duration across time. For constructing the indicator, in a second step, we defined different variables and methods for specific case studies. Smartphone sensor data are being collected from a limited number of individuals and for one week. These data are used to evaluate the proposed indicator. Based on the value of the indicator, we analyzed the potential for identifying CM among groups of users, such as sharing traveling resources (e.g., carpooling, ridesharing, parking sharing) and time (rescheduling and reordering activities). [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 86 (10 UL)
Full Text
See detailUsage public normalisé ou anormal: Kant et les Lumières face à Jeffrey Stout
Burks, Deven UL

in Ruffing, Margit; Grapotte, Sophie; Lequan, Mai (Eds.) Kant: L’année 1784: Droit et philosophie de l’histoire (2017, October)

Dans “Réponse à la question: Qu’est-ce que les Lumières?”, Kant se donne pour tâche de garantir “la plus inoffensive de toutes les libertés, celle de faire publiquement usage de sa raison en toutes ... [more ▼]

Dans “Réponse à la question: Qu’est-ce que les Lumières?”, Kant se donne pour tâche de garantir “la plus inoffensive de toutes les libertés, celle de faire publiquement usage de sa raison en toutes choses” et, par là même, de fonder le progrès des lumières dans un discours public de type normalisé. La démarche de Kant se révèle normalisante dans la mesure où elle “rend commensurable toute contribution au discours dans un domaine” (Jeffrey Stout, Ethics After Babel, p. 294, ma traduction): dans l’usage public, tout interlocuteur part d’un vocabulaire épuré, “à titre de savant”, pour s’adresser à un public de “lecteurs” de sorte que tout autre interlocuteur peut accepter les raisons du premier, peu importe sa fonction dans la société. Une telle normalisation des conditions de pratiques discursives peut-elle réellement faire progresser la société humaine comme le prétend Kant? Certes, un discours normalisé rend compte de la fragmentation de l’autorité dans la société moderne. Mais il résiste à l’effort de certains interlocuteurs, peu satisfaits de ses prétentions libérales fondationnalistes, d’y apporter des éléments justificatifs issus non pas des usages publics de la raison mais de ceux dits “privés”. Car, pour Jeffrey Stout, la discussion qui fait réellement progresser la société cosmopolite passe par l’écoute, “l’interaction conversationnelle” et la critique improvisée dans un “discours anormal” (idem.). À force de vouloir fixer les critères du débat en avance, on le rendrait en même temps stérile. Si cela constitue une critique forte d’un discours normalisé kantien dont les principes sont fondationnalistes, il n’exclut nullement un discours normalisé kantien de type non-fondationnaliste. A cet effet, il suffirait de supposer une raison pratique et un discours modaux, sensibles aux particularités des interlocuteurs, selon lesquels l’usage public exige des interlocuteurs des raisons qui pourraient être adoptées de façon cohérente par tout interlocuteur dans le domaine en question (cf. Towards justice and virtue, Onora O’Neill). Dans cet optique modal, l’usage public résiste-il mieux ou finit-il par se rapprocher de ses critiques plus qu’on ne le soupçonne? [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 9 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailLes usages de l’Internet : quelles conséquences sur la mémoire humaine ?
Roelens, Nathalie UL

in Mémoires et Internet (2010)

Detailed reference viewed: 47 (3 UL)
Full Text
See detailLes usages des expertises psy au procès d’assises et les définitions pratiques de la responsabilité
Saetta, Sébastien UL; Sicot, François; Renard, Tristan

in Déviance et Société (2010), 34(4), 647-669

The problem of evaluating the personality of suspects, which runs alongside that of individualising sentencing, is at the centre of current preoccupations known as « the new social defence’ ». This ... [more ▼]

The problem of evaluating the personality of suspects, which runs alongside that of individualising sentencing, is at the centre of current preoccupations known as « the new social defence’ ». This article is concerned with the use of experts in a particular context, that of cases at the higher criminal courts, where the work of experts is built into a chain of different procedural steps and where the personality of the suspect is considered by several different actors. The exchanges around these questions are not so much concerned with defining dangerousness or treatability, as the moral aspect of the crime. This call for expertise shows that, in this process, those involved are constructing practical definitions of responsibility. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 12 (0 UL)