References of "Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
See detailWahlsystem und politische Kultur
Fehlen, Fernand UL

in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2013), 332

Detailed reference viewed: 70 (0 UL)
See detailBildung als Selbstbestimmung
Hofmann, Frank UL

Article for general public (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (0 UL)
Full Text
See detailLa citoyenneté de résidence, diverses logiques et la science juridique
Heuschling, Luc UL

in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 60 (5 UL)
See detailIst das Böse banal?
Mauer, Heike UL

in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2013), 326

Detailed reference viewed: 39 (1 UL)
See detailWie viele Sprachen braucht die Luxemburger Grundschule?
Fehlen, Fernand UL

in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2013), 325

Detailed reference viewed: 77 (6 UL)
Full Text
See detailFiktionen der Macht : Public Viewing statt Public Opinion?
Kmec, Sonja UL; Kohns, Oliver UL

Article for general public (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 148 (14 UL)
See detailGlaube in der Moderne: nur noch Option? Hans Joas' Sicht zu Moderne und Sàkularisierung.
Weber, Jean-Marie UL

in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2012), Nr 324

Detailed reference viewed: 25 (0 UL)
Full Text
See detailDébats et non-débats constitutionnels au Luxembourg. Une topologie critique
Heuschling, Luc UL

Article for general public (2012)

Detailed reference viewed: 259 (51 UL)
Full Text
See detailL’embarras du choix. Réflexions sur la durabilité de la consommation ordinaire
Reckinger, Rachel UL

in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2012), 320

Detailed reference viewed: 28 (0 UL)
Full Text
See detailSays Who? Edward Steichen, son oeuvre et sa réception à Luxembourg
Poos, Françoise UL

Article for general public (2012)

This article is part of the Forum special issue about the relations between Luxembourg and the United States. In this context, 'Says Who?' analyses the complex reception of the work of Luxembourg born ... [more ▼]

This article is part of the Forum special issue about the relations between Luxembourg and the United States. In this context, 'Says Who?' analyses the complex reception of the work of Luxembourg born American artist and curator, Edward Steichen, in his native country. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 19 (0 UL)
See detailWahrgenommene Rechte von Menschen mit Alzheimer
Bourkel, Elisabeth UL

Article for general public (2012)

Detailed reference viewed: 30 (2 UL)
Full Text
See detailMenschen in informeller Pflege - Zwischen Recht und Rechtfertigung
Ferring, Dieter UL

Article for general public (2012)

Detailed reference viewed: 52 (5 UL)
Full Text
See detail„Die Würde des Menschen ist (un)antastbar“
Ferring, Dieter UL

Article for general public (2012)

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (3 UL)
Full Text
See detailNetzwerke der Elite. Luxemburger Studentenzirkel als Instrumente der Inklusion und Exklusion
Rohstock, Anne UL; Schreiber, Catherina UL

in Forum für Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in Luxemburg (2012), (314), 33-35

Since Luxembourg became independent in 1839, practically the entire political, economic and intellectual elite of the country has been socialised abroad. It was only in 2003 that the Grand Duchy set up ... [more ▼]

Since Luxembourg became independent in 1839, practically the entire political, economic and intellectual elite of the country has been socialised abroad. It was only in 2003 that the Grand Duchy set up its own university; before then, young Luxembourgers had to study in foreign countries. Over the past 150 years, Lux- embourg has thus experienced exceptionally lively student migration. This migration is almost unique in Europe; however, academic research has paid little attention to the consequences of the migration experience of whole student gen- erations on Luxembourgish society. The data presented in this paper demonstrate that migration has opened up chances for participation and access to positions of social power, while at the same time the networks of students became an instrument of social exclusion. Thus, the migration experience over the past 150 years not only led to a strong degree of social–cultural cohesion within the national elite; paradoxically, international student mobility has also had deep effects on the preservation of national identity. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 68 (6 UL)