References of "Ligeti, Katalin 50002215"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
See detailOverprosecution and Negotiated Justice in Europe
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Van Kempen, Piet Hein (Ed.) Overuse in the Criminal Justice System: On Criminalization, Prosecution and Imprisonment (2019)

Detailed reference viewed: 32 (3 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailThe Place of the Prosecutor in Common Law and Civil Law Jurisdictions
Ligeti, Katalin UL

in Brown, Darryl; Iontcheva Turner, Jenia; Weisser, Bettina (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process (2019)

This chapter focuses on the place of the public prosecutor in common law and civil law jurisdictions. It first describes the institutional positioning of public prosecutors, particularly vis-à-vis the ... [more ▼]

This chapter focuses on the place of the public prosecutor in common law and civil law jurisdictions. It first describes the institutional positioning of public prosecutors, particularly vis-à-vis the executive power, before discussing their role and powers in regard to the pretrial phase. It then considers the increasing tendency to entrust the public prosecutor with quasi-judicial sanctioning powers in the context of out-of-court procedures (“prosecutorial adjudication”). It also examines the role of specialized law enforcement authorities in the exercise of investigative and prosecutorial functions, coercive measures and the need for judicial authorization, and prosecutorial discretion and alternatives to trial proceedings. Finally, it explains how independence, centralization and decentralization, legality and opportunity of prosecution, and the alternatives to trial proceedings have been translated to the supranational design of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 36 (3 UL)
Full Text
See detailPunitive Liability of Heads of Business in the EU: A Comparative Study
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Marletta, Angelo

Book published by Wolters Kluwer - CEDAM (2019)

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the individual liability of senior managers has been rediscovered as an important element in effectively countering economic and financial crime. Mainstream ... [more ▼]

In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the individual liability of senior managers has been rediscovered as an important element in effectively countering economic and financial crime. Mainstream enforcement practices against white-collar crime in recent years, focusing mostly on the legal entity or the low- and mid-level employees, have been largely unsuccessful. The punishment of large corporations for economic offences has indeed been confronted with the “too big to jail” dilemma, and with concerns for the negative spillovers that their collapse may entail for employees, shareholders and consumers. The individual “rogue employee”, on the other hand, may be fungible and easily sacrificed as a scapegoat. The recent debate has therefore brought back to centre-stage the individual liability of senior managers, which is essential to close any “responsibility gap”. But are the ordinary rules of criminal law fit and adequate to hold senior managers accountable? This volume, presenting the findings of a study led by the University of Luxembourg and co-financed by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), aims to contribute to this debate with a special focus on the liability of senior managers for the commission of offences against the financial interests of the EU. It compares the criminal liability regimes for senior managers in five Member States (Finland, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Poland) and delivers a set of policy recommendations for establishing the liability of senior managers in compliance with the general principles of criminal law and respect for fundamental rights. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 43 (3 UL)
See detailPreventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL; European Law Institute

Book published by Oxford University Press (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 80 (16 UL)
See detailToward a Prosecutor for the European Union. Vol. 2: Draft Rules of procedure
Ligeti, Katalin UL

Book published by Hart Publishing (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 462 (34 UL)
Full Text
See detailEU 'Horizontal' Report
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Marletta, Angelo UL

in Vervaele, John; Simonato, Michele; Luchtman, Michiel (Eds.) Exchange of information with EU and national enforcement authorities. Improving OLAF legislative framework through a comparison with other EU authorities (ECN/ESMA/ECB) (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 69 (5 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailTransnational Enforcement of Production Orders for Electronic Evidence. Beyond Mutual Recognition?
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Kert, Robert; Lehner, Andrea (Eds.) Vielfahlt des Strafrechts im internationalen Kontext: Festschrift für Frank Höpfel zum 65. Geburtstag (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 171 (29 UL)
See detailChallenges and Trends in Enforcing Economic and Financial Crime: Criminal Law and Alternatives in Europe and the US
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Tosza, Stanislaw

in Ligeti, Katalin; Tosza, Stanislaw (Eds.) White Collar Crime. A Comparative Perspective (2018)

This chapter by Katalin Ligeti and Stanislaw Tosza provides a synthesis of the main findings of the book edited by the two authors (White Collar Crime. A Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, 2018 ... [more ▼]

This chapter by Katalin Ligeti and Stanislaw Tosza provides a synthesis of the main findings of the book edited by the two authors (White Collar Crime. A Comparative Perspective, Hart Publishing, 2018). The chapter first presents the challenges in investigating and prosecuting economic and financial crime (section II). The analysis of four national systems (France, Poland, Sweden, and the US) complemented by the information provided in the transversal chapters led to the identification of four major tendencies in the field in response to these challenges (section III): the swinging of enforcement strategies between prosecuting individuals or/and corporations (section III.A); the extension of punitive sanctions and the use of compliance programmes as punishment (section III.B); the extensive use of alternatives to criminal proceedings (section III.C); and the increased role of private actors in controlling economic and financial crime (section III.D). In section 4, these responses are scrutinised from the perspective of the human rights regime. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 33 (0 UL)
See detailWhite Collar Crime. A Comparative Perspective
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Tosza, Stanislaw

Book published by Hart Publishing (2018)

Detailed reference viewed: 90 (12 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailFundamental rights protection between Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Extending Transnational ne bis in idem Across Administrative and Criminal Procedures
Ligeti, Katalin UL

in Ligeti, Katalin; Robinson, Gavin; ELI (European Law Institute) (Eds.) Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law (2018)

This chapter analyses the conceptual roots of extended ne bis in idem protection and, in particular, how the concept of ‘criminal charge’ developed by the ECtHR impacts the interpretative outcomes of the ... [more ▼]

This chapter analyses the conceptual roots of extended ne bis in idem protection and, in particular, how the concept of ‘criminal charge’ developed by the ECtHR impacts the interpretative outcomes of the CJEU and the ECtHR respectively. The chapter will then present the specific case law of the two Courts on extended ne bis in idem, including the latest developments, and will offer an assessment of the consequences of this jurisprudence for transnational cases in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ). In particular, the transnational application of extended ne bis in idem requires a reconceptualisation and rethinking of the legal framework for preventing and resolving conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the AFSJ. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 17 (3 UL)
See detailCross-border access to electronic evidence: Policy and legislative challenges
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Carrera, Sergio; Mitsilegas, Valsamis (Eds.) Constitutionalising the Security Union: Effectiveness, rule of law and rights in countering terrorism and crime (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 129 (35 UL)
See detailThe Protection of the Procedural Rights of Persons Concerned by OLAF Administrative Investigations and the Admissibility of OLAF Final Reports as Criminal Evidence
Ligeti, Katalin UL

Report (2017)

This paper provides an analysis of two crucial and interconnected aspects of the current legal framework on the investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): the procedural safeguards ... [more ▼]

This paper provides an analysis of two crucial and interconnected aspects of the current legal framework on the investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): the procedural safeguards for the individuals subject to the administrative investigations conducted by OLAF and the admissibility in evidence of OLAF Final Reports in national criminal proceedings. The state of the art and its shortcomings are analysed in the double perspective of the coherent protection of the EU’s financial interests and of the respect of fundamental rights provided by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 99 (17 UL)
See detail"Bespoke" UK-EU Police and Judicial Cooperation Post-Brexit
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Criminology in Europe (2017), 16(2), 11-14

Detailed reference viewed: 135 (9 UL)
See detailTransversal Report on Judicial Protection
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Robinson, Gavin UL

in Luchtman, Michiel; Vervaele, John (Eds.) Investigatory powers and procedural safeguards: Improving OLAF’s legislative framework through a comparison with other EU law enforcement authorities (ECN/ESMA/ECB) (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 63 (11 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailCurrent Challenges in Economic and Financial Criminal Law in Europe and the US
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Franssen, Vanessa

in Ligeti, Katalin; Franssen, Vanessa (Eds.) Challenges in the Field of Economic and Financial Crime in Europe and the US (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 149 (3 UL)
See detailChasing criminal money in the EU: New tools and practices?
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Simonato, Michele UL

Book published by Hart Publishing (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 266 (32 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailAsset Recovery in the EU:Towards a Comprehensive Enforcement Model beyond Confiscation? An Introduction
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Simonato, Michele

in Ligeti, Katalin; Simonato, Michele (Eds.) Chasing Criminal Money. Challenges and Perspectives on Asset Recovery in the EU (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 148 (7 UL)
Full Text
See detailChallenges in the field of economic and financial crime in Europe and the US
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Franssen, Vanessa

Book published by Hart Publishing (2017)

Detailed reference viewed: 304 (29 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailEU Criminal Justice Actors: Accountability and Judicial Review vis a vis the EU Citizen
Ligeti, Katalin UL; Marletta, Angelo UL

in New Journal of European Criminal Law (2016), 7(2), 175

The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice represents both a constitutional objective and a solemn commitment of the Union towards its citizens. Being the AFSJ a domain of shared competence, many different ... [more ▼]

The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice represents both a constitutional objective and a solemn commitment of the Union towards its citizens. Being the AFSJ a domain of shared competence, many different actors are entrusted and responsible for the fulfilment of this commitment. After the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, EU citizenship became a central reference point for allocating shared responsibility and regulating the multilevel and multifarious interactions between the different legislative and enforcement actors involved in the development of the EU’s most sensitive policy domain. Accordingly, this contribution will explore and provide a critical account on the potential of the “fundamental status” with regard to the democratic accountability of the legislative process under Title V TFEU, the parliamentary scrutiny over the AFSJ Agencies and the judicial protection of citizens’ rights against the acts of the AFSJ enforcement actors. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 91 (2 UL)