References of "Biesta, Gert 50000783"
     in
Bookmark and Share    
See detailIntroduction: The new curriculum.
Priestley, M; Biesta, Gert UL

in Priestley, M; Biesta, Gert (Eds.) Reinventing the curriculum. New trends in curriculum policy and practice (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 64 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailTeacher education for educational wisdom.
Biesta, Gert UL

in Waldorf Research Bulletin (2013), 18(1),

Detailed reference viewed: 58 (0 UL)
Full Text
See detail“We gotta get out of this place.” On the distance between learning and education in the sensory curriculum.
Biesta, Gert UL

in The Journal of School and Society (2013), 1(1), -

Detailed reference viewed: 56 (2 UL)
See detailLearning in public places: Civic learning for the 21st century.
Biesta, Gert UL

in Biesta, Gert; de Bie, Maria; Wildemeersch, Danny (Eds.) Civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 188 (4 UL)
See detailA curriculum for the 21st century
Biesta, Gert UL; Priestley, M

in Priestley, M; Biesta, Gert (Eds.) Reinventing the curriculum. New trends in curriculum policy and practice (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 69 (0 UL)
See detailCapacities and the curriculum
Biesta, Gert UL; Priestley, M

in Priestley, M; Biesta, Gert (Eds.) Reinventing the curriculum. New trends in curriculum policy and practice (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 58 (1 UL)
Peer Reviewed
See detailTime out? Can education do and be done without time?
Biesta, Gert UL

in Szkudlarek, T; Sultana, R (Eds.) Education and the political: New theoretical articulations (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 73 (0 UL)
See detailEfterskrift: Demokrati, medborgerskab og den offentlige sfaere
Biesta, Gert UL

in Biesta, Gert (Ed.) Demokratilaering i skole og samfund (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 33 (0 UL)
See detailResponsible citizens: Citizenship education between social inclusion and democratic politics
Biesta, Gert UL

in Priestley, M; Biesta, Gert (Eds.) Reinventing the curriculum. New trends in curriculum policy and practice (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 117 (0 UL)
See detailPragmatizzare il curricolo: riportare la conoscenza all’interno della conversazione curricolare, ma attraverso il pragmatism.
Biesta, Gert UL

in Corbi, E; Oliverio, S (Eds.) Oltre la Bildung postmoderna? La pedagogia tra istanze costruttiviste e orizzonti post-moderni (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 71 (0 UL)
See detailTeacher education for educational wisdom.
Biesta, Gert UL

in Hare, W; Portelli, J (Eds.) Philosophy of Education: Introductory Readings (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 40 (0 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailOpening discourses of citizenship education: a theorization with Foucault.
Nicoll, K; Fejes, A; Olson, M et al

in Journal of Education Policy (2013), 28(6), 828-846

We argue two major difficulties in current discourses of citizenship education. The first is a relative masking of student discourses of citizenship by positioning students as lacking citizenship and as ... [more ▼]

We argue two major difficulties in current discourses of citizenship education. The first is a relative masking of student discourses of citizenship by positioning students as lacking citizenship and as outside the community that acts. The second is in failing to understand the discursive and material support for citizenship activity. We, thus, argue that it is not a lack of citizenship that education research might address, but identification and exploration of the different forms of citizenship that students already engage in. We offer a fragmentary, poststructuralist theorization oriented to explore the ‘contemporary limits of the necessary’, drawing on specific resources from the work of Michel Foucault and others for the constitution of local, partial accounts of citizenship discourses and activities, and exploration of their possibilities and constraints. We argue this as a significant tactic of theorization in support of an opening of discourses of citizenship and in avoiding the discursive difficulties that we have identified. Our theorization, then, is significant in its potential to unsettle discourses that confine contemporary thought regarding citizenship education and support exploration of what might be excessive to that confinement. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 100 (0 UL)
See detailIntroduction: Civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere.
Biesta, Gert UL; de Bie, Maria; Wildemeersch, Danny

in Biesta, Gert; de Bie, Maria; Wildemeersch, Danny (Eds.) Civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 62 (2 UL)
See detailCivic learning. democratic Citizenship and the Public Sphere
Biesta, Gert UL; de Bie, Maria; Wildemeersch, Danny

Book published by Springer (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 90 (0 UL)
See detailCitizenship education
Biesta, Gert UL

in Bryce, T.G.K.; Humes, W.M.; Gillies, D. (Eds.) et al Scottish education. Fourth edition (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 75 (5 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailResponsive or responsible? Democratic education for the global networked society.
Biesta, Gert UL

in Policy Futures in Education (2013), 11(6), 734-745

Detailed reference viewed: 150 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailKnowledge, judgement and the curriculum: On the past, present and future of the idea of 'the practical'.
Biesta, Gert UL

in Journal of Curriculum Studies (2013), 45(5), 684-696

In 1970, Joseph Schwab published the first of four papers that argued for a turn to the idea of the Practical in curriculum research and practice. In this paper, I revisit Schwab’s original paper and ... [more ▼]

In 1970, Joseph Schwab published the first of four papers that argued for a turn to the idea of the Practical in curriculum research and practice. In this paper, I revisit Schwab’s original paper and explore the extent to which his case for the Practical is still relevant today. I first look at the past of the deliberative tradition in which Schwab’s argument is located. I argue that a more precise engagement with the work of Aristotle – particularly the distinction between making/production and doing, and between knowledge of the eternal and of the variable – can strengthen Schwab’s case and allow for a better understanding of the kind of knowledge and judgement needed in education. In relation to the present, I highlight three ways in which the current context has changed from when Schwab published his paper. These concern the strongly diminished space for teachers’ professional judgement; the rise of a call for evidence-based education; and the shift in curriculum studies away from practical questions. To (re)connect the field of curriculum studies and research with questions about the ‘doing’ of curriculum is, in my view, where a deliberative approach such as the one articulated by Schwab remains highly relevant. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 92 (6 UL)
See detailTeachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum.
Priestley, M; Biesta, Gert UL; Robinson, S

in Priestley, M; Biesta, Gert (Eds.) Reinventing the curriculum. New trends in curriculum policy and practice (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 330 (2 UL)
Full Text
Peer Reviewed
See detailÅ snakke 'pedagogikk' til 'education': Internasjonalisering og problemet med konseptuell hegemoni i studiet av pedagogikk.
Biesta, Gert UL

in Norsk Pedagogisk Tidskrift (2013), 97(3), 172-184

I lys av internasjonaliseringen av den anglo-amerikanske konstruksjonen av feltet «education», presenterer og diskuterer artikkelen problemet med konseptuell hegemoni i pedagogisk forskning. Ved å drøfte ... [more ▼]

I lys av internasjonaliseringen av den anglo-amerikanske konstruksjonen av feltet «education», presenterer og diskuterer artikkelen problemet med konseptuell hegemoni i pedagogisk forskning. Ved å drøfte forskjellen mellom den engelskspråklige konstruksjonen «education» og den tyskspråklige konstruksjonen «Pädagogik», viser artikkelen hvordan en monokulturell tilnærming til pedagogikk – ved å ødelegge viktige og levedyktige alternativer – står i fare for å gjøre feltet meget sårbart. I forsøket på å gjøre distinksjonen mellom de to konstruksjonene tydelig, er det i oversettelsen av artikkelen systematisk benyttet begrepet «education» og kombinasjoner med «education» i tilknytning til den anglo-amerikanske konstruksjonen. «Pädagogik» og tyskspråklige begrep er brukt i tilknytning til den kontinentale konstruksjonen. Ellers er begrepene «pedagogikk» og «pedagogisk» brukt. [less ▲]

Detailed reference viewed: 262 (1 UL)
See detailReinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice.
Biesta, Gert UL; Priestley, Mark

Book published by Bloomsbury (2013)

Detailed reference viewed: 146 (3 UL)